The United States Supreme Court, often under the media’s spotlight, has been subject to various labels throughout its history. One label that has gained traction is “conservative” and even “radical.” However, attempting to pigeonhole the Court solely as conservative oversimplifies its complex and nuanced nature. While it is true that the Court has seen periods of conservative influence, a deeper examination reveals a philosophical commitment to the balance of power and a propensity for challenging overreaching bureaucracies and executive orders. It simply wants each branch of government to do its job.
The US Supreme Court is a unique institution designed to interpret the Constitution and ensure that the government operates within its defined limits. Over the years, the Court’s composition has evolved, leading to shifts in its judicial philosophy. During some periods, conservative justices have held a significant presence, and their decisions might reflect a more traditional interpretation of the Constitution. Nevertheless, these periods have also witnessed landmark decisions protecting individual rights and promoting the principles of equality and justice.
Beyond ideological labels, this Court demonstrates a keen interest in preserving the system of checks and balances. Its primary aim is to ensure that each branch of government functions according to its prescribed role, without overstepping its authority or abandoning its responsibilities. This philosophy is not exclusive to conservative justices; rather, it is embedded in the Court’s tradition and guiding principles.
One of the Court’s critical roles is to act as a check on executive orders and prevent potential abuses of power. Regardless of the president’s political affiliation, the Court has historically scrutinized executive actions to safeguard the Constitution’s integrity and protect citizens’ rights. Such decisions have occurred throughout history, reaffirming the Court’s commitment to its duty as a check on government overreach.
Moreover, the Court’s judgments have not been limited to challenging the executive branch alone; it has also acted as a check on the legislative branch. When Congress oversteps its bounds or passes laws that infringe upon individual liberties, the Supreme Court has demonstrated a willingness to intervene, striking down such legislation to preserve the constitutional rights of American citizens.
It is essential to understand that the US Supreme Court is a dynamic institution, reflecting the changing values and societal norms of the nation. This dynamism is reflected in the diverse range of opinions among the justices themselves. Each justice brings unique perspectives shaped by their experiences, legal backgrounds, and personal beliefs, which can lead to varying interpretations of the Constitution.
In conclusion, the US Supreme Court defies easy categorization as simply “conservative.” While conservative ideologies have held sway in certain eras, the Court’s overarching commitment lies in ensuring a balance of power among the branches of government and safeguarding individual rights.
Parzivand is an attorney in Houston, Texas that focuses on labor law. He is a long time contributor on the Price of Business show. Learn more about him at www.Parzfirm.com.
The Price of Business is one of the longest running shows of its kind in the country and is in markets coast to coast. The Host, Kevin Price, is a multi-award winning author, broadcast journalist, and syndicated columnist. Learn more about the show and its digital partners at www.PriceofBusiness.com (scroll down to the bottom of the page).
LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW IN ITS ENTIRETY HERE: